The Australian arm of South African financial services conglomerate Sanlam Group will need to have its compliance processes reviewed by an independent expert after it admitted to breaching its licensee obligations and provided a court enforceable undertaking (CEU) to ASIC.
ASIC’s investigation into Sanlam Private Wealth Pty Ltd (Sanlam) uncovered concerns that the Australian financial services licensee had breached its general obligations, including by failing to adequately supervise its many authorised representatives and corporate authorised representatives (CARs). A number of those CARs were fintechs who offered online trading platforms and crypto-based investment products that posed risks to retail clients.
ASIC Deputy Chair Sarah Court said, ‘At one point, Sanlam had 42 CARs and 71 authorised representatives operating under its licence. Despite this, it had plainly inadequate resources and processes to ensure its diverse cohort of authorised entities complied with the law and to oversee those who used its licence to offer risky financial products to retail clients.
‘Licensees like Sanlam must have robust compliance processes that are fit-for-purpose to ensure that those who operate under their licence comply with the law and don’t place Australian investors at risk.’
Sanlam’s CARs offered diverse financial services ranging from traditional share trading to emerging fintech services. Some of its fintech CARs managed large pools of investor assets and serviced large retail client bases.
ASIC’s investigation identified that Sanlam:
- did not have adequate review processes to assess whether its representatives complied with financial services laws,
- had limited risk management systems that did not address the distinct risks for each division of its financial services business,
- had inadequate human resources dedicated to risk management and compliance,
- had an inadequate number of responsible managers with suitable expertise to cover the diversity of the financial services offered by its CARs, and
- failed to implement a training program to assess its authorised representatives’ skills.
As part of the CEU, Sanlam must engage an ASIC-approved independent expert to review its systems and processes. It must also provide remedial action plans to ASIC and the independent expert, which ASIC and the independent expert will review to ensure Sanlam is taking appropriate steps to comply with the CEU.
Download
Court enforceable undertakings register
Background
Sanlam has held an Australian Financial Services licence since August 2009 and is authorised to provide financial services to retail and wholesale clients. Since at least 2019, Sanlam has appointed authorised representatives and CARs under its licence to provide financial services on its behalf.
ASIC’s approach to accepting court enforceable undertakings can be found in Regulatory Guide 100 Court enforceable undertakings.
ASIC has previously intervened to ensure AFS licensees provide appropriate oversight of authorised entities:
- In August 2022, ASIC reminded licensees of their obligation to have adequate resources to monitor and supervise their representatives (22-239MR).
- In December 2023, ASIC released Report 778 Review of online trading providers, which identified issues in how AFS licensees provided oversight and supervision of online trading providers operating under their licences (23-327MR).
- In April 2024, ASIC secured a $1.25 million penalty against Lanterne Fund Services Pty Ltd for breaching its licence obligations when it failed to provide appropriate oversight of its authorised representatives and CARs (24-071MR).